According to building standards, which jurisdiction generally prevails in conflicts between codes?

In building standards, the principle that the most restrictive requirements prevail in the case of conflicts among codes is rooted in the aim of ensuring safety and welfare. This approach promotes a hierarchy where the code that demands the highest standards determines compliance.

When conflicts arise, embracing the more stringent code—whether it is local, state, or federal—helps to safeguard occupants, protect property, and enhance overall community standards. Local authorities may have specific needs or conditions that necessitate additional restrictions; hence, their codes can often be more rigorous than state or federal regulations.

By prioritizing the most restrictive requirements, jurisdictions encourage builders and developers to maintain a high level of safety and quality in construction practices. This principle ensures that any existing codes that further enhance safety, such as those addressing unique environmental or community hazards, will take precedence over others that may be less stringent.