In which situation is a written contract between an architect and a client not required?

Prepare for the California Supplemental Exam with our CSE ARE Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

A written contract between an architect and a client is not required in situations involving services that are similar to past services without payment. In these cases, if the services provided closely resemble previously agreed-upon services, and no financial transaction is made, a written contract might not be deemed necessary since there is a history of understanding and agreement between the architect and the client. This continuity can reduce the need for formal documentation in these instances, especially if both parties are aware of the expectations based on prior engagements.

In contrast, verbal agreements made in good faith can create ambiguity and are often considered less enforceable than written contracts. Government-funded projects typically have strict regulations governing contracts and documentation, making a written contract necessary to comply with legal and funding requirements. For repeat clients, a written agreement can help clarify services and expectations, regardless of the previous relationship, ensuring that all parties are aligned on the scope and nature of the new services.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy